Everything that you are saying would be true if Tehelka was the last word on all issues. But it is not. They have an ideology and we know what it is. Why don't we learn to be a little bit more skeptical about our sources?
What is the police version? Why was the Ashram demolished (if it was)? It is quite possible that people in the Ashram had links with Maoists- a revolutionary group with a violent totalitarian ideology that is trying to overthrow a legitimate democratically elected government.
On Nov 17, 2009 Mitra wrote:
Everything that you are saying would be true if Tehelka was the last word on all issues. But it is not. They have an ideology and we know what it is. Why don't we learn to be a little bit more skeptical about our sources?
What is the police version? Why was the Ashram demolished (if it was)? It is quite possible that people in the Ashram had links with Maoists- a revolutionary group with a violent totalitarian ideology that is trying to overthrow a legitimate democratically elected government.